By Samantha Conover
Different plastics degrade according to
their own particular weaknesses. Some plastics are more vulnerable to light,
while others are more vulnerable to moisture. All plastics will eventually
degrade, but there are particular plastics that are considered “malignant” or
“bad neighbours” because their degradation can actually harm nearby materials.
In order to best prevent plastic deterioration, it’s necessary to know what
kind of plastics you’re dealing with.
Plastics can be identified in many ways.
The simplest method of identification involves physical cues and knowledge of
production dates. For example, rubber tends to have a characteristic smell.
Phenol formaldehyde (the plastic used to make the ever-collectible Bakelite)
feels heavier and “chunkier” than other plastics. A plastic object that is
known to be from the late 19th Century is more likely to be
cellulose nitrate than polystyrene because of known production dates (cellulose
nitrate started being produced in the 1860s, while polystyrene entered
production in the 1930s). The careful observation of physical and historical
cues is often all that is needed to successfully identify a plastic.
| This stylish bathing shoe from the 1920s can be identified as rubber because of its flexibility, characteristic smell and production date. |
Photo of cellulose nitrate test - This bright blue colour indicates
that the sample is cellulose nitrate
|
The most exact method of identifying
plastics is through chemical analysis which allows a researcher to obtain the
fullest knowledge of a sample’s chemical composition. One popular method of
analysis is Fourier Transform Infra-Red Spectroscopy (FTIR). FTIR provides
information on a material’s molecular structure and chemical bonds. This is
done by measuring a sample’s absorption of infra-red light which is
mathematically calculated to produce a graph called a spectrum. An FTIR machine
works by beaming a ray of infra-red light at the sample. When the molecules in
the sample are exposed to infra-red light they vibrate in a characteristic
manner. These vibrations are plotted out on the graph which creates a specific
pattern. By comparing this pattern to a reference collection of patterns, a
researcher can identify the sample. A fun way to understand this is to imagine
that each type of plastic scanned has dance “fingerprint” made up of individual
dance moves that distinguishes it from others.
And now… the answer to some of the plastic
mysteries I discussed in a previous blog post. It seems my suspicions were right
about the shiny lacquer heels! Tests for cellulose nitrate came out
positive. Because cellulose nitrate is
potentially dangerous to the collection I am advising that heels of this type
should be frequently monitored for any changes. I was wrong about the corrosive
beads on the beautiful silk shoe. The beads tested negative for cellulose
nitrate, but I’m still unclear on their identity. I suppose it’s good to have a
mystery to keep me musing.
It has been an amazing experience working
with my favourite material at the Bata
Shoe Museum.
I love plastic because of its ability to provoke controversy and inability to
stay static. To some plastic represents cheap and mass-market manufacture. To
others it signifies bold modern design. Plastic seems to languish in landfills
while revealing its capacity to disintegrate in museum and gallery storage
rooms. It can be a crystal clear acrylic rhinestone heel or flexible faux
leather boot. I hope that my blogs have inspired some to look at plastics in a
new way that finds appreciation for an often overlooked wonder of the modern
world!
No comments:
Post a Comment